AI Judge Maximus Rulings from 2034: Verdicts on AI Ethics and Best Practices

As an AI evangelist, I'm excited to share my expertise and help you navigate the world of Large Language Models (LLMs) - from fine-tuning prompts to evaluating performance - all while keeping humans in the loop.

  • 1. The year is 2034, and AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) judge Maximus has come from the future to preside over cases related to AI engineering.
  • 2. Alex Vov, an AI evangelist with Weights & Biases, provides commentary on each case.
  • 3. Case AIE 7312: Daniel R built a cool LLM (Language Learning Model) rapper chat at a hackathon but didn't win. He charged for it and deployed to production without proper tracing or logging, causing
  • 4. Weights & Biases offers tools for easy tracing and logging in production, providing a dashboard for user interaction tracking and versioning.
  • 5. Case AE 442 312 3: June8 did not attend the AI Expo 2024 after attending an AI engineer summit in 2023. Verdict: Guilty of "many connections lost" for missing the opportunity to learn and connect w
  • 6. Case 332 2127: Sasha S was tasked with building an LLM-powered feature in a big corporate application and achieved improved performance by fine-tuning Lama 3 on company data. However, she didn't it
  • 7. Iterating on prompts can significantly improve model performance before fine-tuning. Weights & Biases offers tools for building robust pipelines and provides integration with popular fine-tuning se
  • 8. Case AE 65523: Maxim, a head of AI at a Fortune 500 company, used Weights & Biases models to implement an LLM-based solution and set up tracing, evaluation pipelines, and fast experiments. Verdict:
  • 9. Users must check judges for biases, create custom criteria, use robust eval runners, and consider visualization tools like Weights & Biases' OpenUI project for model evaluation and comparison.
  • 10. Creating custom criteria based on specific goals is essential to make the most of off-the-shelf LLMs.
  • 11. Case L 101101 AE: Alex, an AI evangelist, has been creating doubtfully educational content, interrupting the judge, and being overly promotional during his talk. Verdict: Guilty of "over commitmen

Source: AI Engineer via YouTube

❓ What do you think? What are your thoughts on the ideas shared in this video? Feel free to share your thoughts in the comments!